Skip to main content

Inquiry Based Learning Final Thoughts

As I end the inquiry-based learning course, I am amazed at how my inquiry understanding has deepened.  Even after 20 years of teaching using questioning and having students provide evidence of their learning, I still have evolved my experience.

Inquiry-based learning is a way to have students explore how to learn.  When teachers use inquiry in their classrooms, students learn critical thinking.  Students are gaining experience to provide justification and evidence for their understanding.  They are spending time on the higher-level thinking skills of Bloom’s taxonomy.  Students need to evaluate information and synthesize old and new knowledge.  They have a teacher as a mentor, guide, and facilitator, not just as the person who has all the control.  This is crucial for students to become well-rounded individuals.

My biggest takeaway is that students gain more control of the classroom.  Students having control does not mean it is a constant party, and no learning is happening as many may think.  This also does not mean that the teacher isn’t planning and providing instruction.  The instruction and content exist; the teacher has carefully planned and organized the lesson to ensure the content is present.  Learning is messy and should be messy.  Students should grapple with the material and create their connections to the learning.  This is how they become invested in their education.  This is inquiry-based learning.  

As I continue to teach, I plan to guide students towards inquiry.  I will continue to constantly supply my students with endless questions and guidance on the material.   I will start with guided and spend time teaching students how to learn.  I will discuss perfectionism, rubrics, learning, and feedback with students.  We will become partners in teaching and learning.  I will slowly adapt students from guided inquiry to student-driven inquiry.  I have begun to see how I can scaffold materials, lessons, and assessments to aid all levels of students. 

Finally, I am refining my ability to explain to students my teaching methodology for them to understand what they are experiencing.  This is so important to me; students can find great anxiety to learn through discovery and are nervous about failing.  I am learning how to redefine failure and learning from mistakes to help ease these nerves.  I have continued to evolve and model lifelong learning for my students. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Computer Science Week

  It's   CSED Week !!!!! The week is to call teachers to inspire students to learn computer science.  Notice it says INSPIRE.  You don't need to be a computer science teacher or know coding in order to inspire students to learn about computer science there are so many ways: Research how technology is being used in a field today  Look at a Large Data set related to the field of study you know, let students narrow down the data  Have students read about Computer Scientists particularly ones they might not have heard about.  Such as people who invented the Internet, GPS, game consoles, smart devices, etc..  Use Twitter to connect with current Computer Scientists to ask them questions. Let students devise the questions to ask.  If you want to code there are great ways to have students start coding in the classroom.  Just search hour of code and for one hour you can do a simple project.  There are tons of places out there.  If you don't know how to code, don't worry most are

Project Based Learning: Gold Standards

  PBLWorks  is the gold standard for Project Based Learning(PBL).  They provide many resources for teachers wishing to adopt PBL into their curriculum.  PBL is different from just completing a project; the goal of the PBL is to provide a rigorous learning environment where the student learning goals are centered but and students learn to solve problems by answering complex questions and creating high-quality work (Larmer, 2020). PBL the learning goals are surrounded into the project.  According to PBLWorks and Larmer (2020) there are six essential elements of project design: Challenge Problem or Question Sustained Inquiry Authenticity Student Voice and Choice Reflection Critique and Revision Public Product Not all projects meet these standards, the following three videos from Edutopia show an array of projects that all engage the students in some manner.  The projects demonstrated clearly showed sustain inquiry, student choice, and authenticity. The role of the teacher was as the guide

SMAR Model

In this day and age, thanks to the pandemic, teachers are using technology tools more than ever.  The use of technology is a great way of enhancing our classrooms and having a 21-century approach to learning.  Over the past two years, as I and my colleagues shift our teaching, I begin to wonder where each of the technologies lands on the SAMR model.  Have I moved my technology integration in a way that is productive?  Am I using this time to blow up my teaching to give less content and focus on what students need to learn? The SAMR model of technology integration was designed by Dr. Ruben Puentedura. The idea of the teachers looking at using common terminology when using technology.  The key is to always ask two questions as an educator:  How do you want to use technology and what is the purpose (Ruben, n.d).  Students shouldn't be using technology just to do technology but it should enhance the learning (Reben, n.d).  Below is an image of the levels of the SAMR Model.  Lefflerd, C