Skip to main content

5 E's and Inquiry Based Learning

It is interesting that when in high school, seniors state “I can’t wait to be done with learning.” I have heard this year after year from graduates.  Here I am still learning after over 20 years of teaching. I have really never stopped learning, and that is the goal of inquiry-based learning.  Students are creating the learning, to learn that they will have to continue to learn throughout their life.  Whether it be as simple as changing a toilet seat in your bathroom, to determine the amount of paint you will need to paint a room in your house that is not square, to learning how to write lessons that allow students to be the center of their learning (all three of these I did this week). 

Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, Evaluation.  These 5 simple words were the focus of creating one of the lessons (Number Systems)  for my Big Data Unit.  These are the focus of the BSCS Science Learning model for inquiry-based learning (Bybee, et al, 2006).  Focusing the lesson through these five words challenges the teacher to provide inquiry through each of the steps.  Exploration before Explanation, thus allowing students to construct their own learning before a teacher formally presents anything to the students (Bybee, et al., 2006). The explanation doesn’t even need to be formal information from the teacher, it could be the teacher clarifying when needed (Bybee, et al., 2006). 

Looking at my lesson plan on Number Systems, I am wondering if I can break the Exploration into the Exploration and Explanation.  If I am being honest, I over-thought this lesson and might move items around now that I am reflecting.  In the Elaboration phase, students are applying the information (Northern, 2019)  The hexadecimal flippy do, music wagon, and the color question can be seen as elaboration and the Kahn activity can be seen as the Explanation phase given it is direct learning through Kahn.  The Evaluation would be the assessment of the projects anyway. The Evaluation could be the final quick projects of a comic,  a calendar using hexadecimal and binary numbers, or a quick game about binary and hexadecimal. I would love to have anyone else's thoughts on this. 

I also struggled to write a true open-ended inquiry lesson plan (Board of Regents, 2019).  I feel this is structured/guided as the students don’t need to do all of the Khan Academy lessons for binary if they understand it through the binary game.  I am not sure I would want to develop this lesson through another inquiry-based level. Later in the Big Data unit, my plan is for them to investigate their digital footprint and look at all the information they leave on the Internet.  This will be less structured and the final lesson where they are manipulating data will be open to them to develop their questions and find the data.  Using a variety of types of inquiry in a unit helps the students develop the skills for inquiry and provides a variety of types of lessons that keeps students' attention (Board of Regents, 2019). 

As I have focused this year on my own education, I have explored inquiry-based learning in a variety of ways.  I am still partial to UBD and planning the assessment first, I had this in mind when looking at the 5 E method. I think that both can be used together.  Planning the Evaluation first and then working on how to get the students there through the use of exploration, explanation, and elaboration.  These 5 E's are now added to my mind when I am looking at lesson plans.  They focus on helping create more inquiry into my classroom, by looking at developing questions students can find evidence for from their learning. 


Reference:

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. (2019). Inquiry based learning [pdf]. University of Wisconsin Extended Campus.  https://ce.uwex.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Inquiry-basedlearning.pdf 

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, S., Landes, N. (2006, June 12). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. [pdf]. BSCS Science Learning. https://bscs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/bscs_5e_full_report-1.pdf 

Northern, S. (2019, August 30).  The 5E’s of inquiry-based learning. Knowledge Quest. https://knowledgequest.aasl.org/the-5-es-of-inquiry-based-learning/ 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Computer Science Week

  It's   CSED Week !!!!! The week is to call teachers to inspire students to learn computer science.  Notice it says INSPIRE.  You don't need to be a computer science teacher or know coding in order to inspire students to learn about computer science there are so many ways: Research how technology is being used in a field today  Look at a Large Data set related to the field of study you know, let students narrow down the data  Have students read about Computer Scientists particularly ones they might not have heard about.  Such as people who invented the Internet, GPS, game consoles, smart devices, etc..  Use Twitter to connect with current Computer Scientists to ask them questions. Let students devise the questions to ask.  If you want to code there are great ways to have students start coding in the classroom.  Just search hour of code and for one hour you can do a simple project.  There are tons of places out there.  If you don't know how to code, don't worry most are

Project Based Learning: Gold Standards

  PBLWorks  is the gold standard for Project Based Learning(PBL).  They provide many resources for teachers wishing to adopt PBL into their curriculum.  PBL is different from just completing a project; the goal of the PBL is to provide a rigorous learning environment where the student learning goals are centered but and students learn to solve problems by answering complex questions and creating high-quality work (Larmer, 2020). PBL the learning goals are surrounded into the project.  According to PBLWorks and Larmer (2020) there are six essential elements of project design: Challenge Problem or Question Sustained Inquiry Authenticity Student Voice and Choice Reflection Critique and Revision Public Product Not all projects meet these standards, the following three videos from Edutopia show an array of projects that all engage the students in some manner.  The projects demonstrated clearly showed sustain inquiry, student choice, and authenticity. The role of the teacher was as the guide

SMAR Model

In this day and age, thanks to the pandemic, teachers are using technology tools more than ever.  The use of technology is a great way of enhancing our classrooms and having a 21-century approach to learning.  Over the past two years, as I and my colleagues shift our teaching, I begin to wonder where each of the technologies lands on the SAMR model.  Have I moved my technology integration in a way that is productive?  Am I using this time to blow up my teaching to give less content and focus on what students need to learn? The SAMR model of technology integration was designed by Dr. Ruben Puentedura. The idea of the teachers looking at using common terminology when using technology.  The key is to always ask two questions as an educator:  How do you want to use technology and what is the purpose (Ruben, n.d).  Students shouldn't be using technology just to do technology but it should enhance the learning (Reben, n.d).  Below is an image of the levels of the SAMR Model.  Lefflerd, C